Author Topic: Can you write a program for this Interpreter?  (Read 6926 times)

Aurel

  • Guest
Re: Can you write a program for this Interpreter?
« Reply #15 on: August 07, 2017, 07:23:05 AM »
hi Mark
for testing i use LBB
well i agree JB is better than qb64 sdl-consoler
but i get only this:

B+

  • Guest
Re: Can you write a program for this Interpreter?
« Reply #16 on: August 07, 2017, 11:57:17 AM »
;-))  Probably need to copy save some examples or write a program to be able to run anything.

The files looked for end with *BNB.txt

Attached is a bunch of my test files in zip. Examples until you can figure out how to write your own.

As you can see from screen shot all three of these Windows have a File menu! Load a file for the B interpreter from the running B interpreter program, the one with biggest print.

PS Hey! First time I tried LBB in couple of years, worked right out of the box! :)

PPS LBB lists Edit menu first and THEN Files menu, probably because Edit is built in when use a TextEdit control.

PPPS I was going to say my .bas extension name is registered for SmallBASIC so I write .txt Just Basic program files but you did figure that out because you got the B Interpreter loaded in LBB.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2017, 12:40:13 PM by B+ »

Aurel

  • Guest
Re: Can you write a program for this Interpreter?
« Reply #17 on: August 07, 2017, 12:39:28 PM »
Aha ..ok  :)
yes LBB is far better than jb/lb and it is faster
advantage you can run any program from jb/lb in LBB

B+

  • Guest
Re: Can you write a program for this Interpreter?
« Reply #18 on: August 07, 2017, 12:41:45 PM »
Aha ..ok  :)
yes LBB is far better than jb/lb and it is faster
advantage you can run any program from jb/lb in LBB

Yep! it is a great advantage unless you want to share your experience at JB forum.  ::)

Aurel

  • Guest
Re: Can you write a program for this Interpreter?
« Reply #19 on: August 09, 2017, 12:13:21 PM »
yeah
they dont like lbb because is better than jb/lb